Textkorrektur machen und Verbesserungsvorschläge

Ich kann drauf gucken,
du muss aber ein paar Minuten warten, weil der Text ziemlich lang ist.. :)

Violence, wrong /unjust associations of politic and or religious people, wrong morals – all of it can be caused by books.
Are books dangerous and do they have a negative influence on damage our children? All of it could be possible. In the following comment I will discuss/try to prove whether a law that forbids books is necessary or not. So the question appears “Should books be banned?” (Ich würde den letzten Satz einfach wegschmeißen, du sagst alles mit: „I will discuss…“
Firstly, I am going to define book banning. In my view it applies to the whole country or any union. Book banning means to ban a book so that now one can read it legal making it illegal for the people to read books. (das ist korrekt, aber klingt nicht so schön)
On the one hand there are people who say claim that books should be banned. They argue that there are many books that should be banned(doppelt gemoppelt), because there are because of their content of the book,which may be against the law and if we do not ban these books/if such books will not be banned, we can buy a bomb building book in the bookstore. ? ich weiß nicht, was du meinst
Secondly, they some people argue that books can be dangerous for our children, because the children they do not understand the deeper sense of a book, so they can get a wrong opinion of the book about it. (das macht Bücher nicht für die Kinder gefährlich!, es passiert sehr oft, dass die Kinder Bücher nicht vestehen, aber das kann nur als traurig gelten, nicht als etwas Gefährliches) What is more, some experts believe that children can get long time damages (?) from some books, because they do not understand the sense or understand the sense of the book wrong. (Den Argument verstehe ich noch einmal nicht…. Vielleicht meinst du, dass Bücher einen kontroversen Inhalt haben können, den für die jüngeren Menschen schädlich sein kann? Dann schreib z.B. Very often young children read books that are not appropriate for their age. Such books may include violence, abusive language etc. )
Last but not least, some people can consider book as an example for their own life and make the book an indicator of their future. They cannot separate the reality from the fiction, so they build create their own fictional worlds.

On the other hand, I think that you can reach the same effect can be reached by enacting introducing the age-limits for the readers, so that you can certain books could be read after reaching only in a certain age. This method could already be enforced promoted by experts through CDs, DVDs, etc.
Another point is that books are the important source of knowledge, even those with “wrong opinions” controversial opinions?. One can get to know the author’s point of view learn how the author think and you learn something new about the varies of life.
But The main point, however, is that book banning transgresses is against the First Amendment. Because the First Amendment It says that the citizen has freedom of opinion and press(?) to read what one wants?. Obviously So you can not ban books cannot be banned, because you transgress it would mean the interference in the constitutional law.
All in all I agree that some books should be read only by mainly for children, but I also think that also children can read such books with the right enlightenment. In my opinion you should not ban books books should not be banned, because they are important/crucial for the shaping knowledge and giving a vivid image into a culture. and the banning transgress the law.

ja bitte entweder hier oder

hauke-peters@web.de