Ist das richtig?
Frage: Ist das richtig?(2 Antworten)
Hallo! :) Ich hoffe jemand von euch kann mir weiterhelfen... Ich muss ein Comment schreiben... In the last ten years the attitude to nuclear power plants has change. However environmentalist were against to build new reactors. They bring forward the argument, that nuclear power plants are too dangerous. But lately they diagnose, that nuclear power plants are useful to save the environment. On the one hand to build new reactors bring many advantages. Firstly the UK wants to become independent of oil as soon as possible, as the oil reserves are declining. Furthermore to import cheap gas from Russia isn´t a solution, because the Russian goverment deploy the gas reserve as a political weapon. In addition a nuclear reactor creates only a small amount of greenhouse gases and it saves the economy without destroying the environment.A positive side-effect is, if the goverment and the companies build new reactors, it will create 10.000 new jobs. But on the other hand there are a lot of disadvantages. To build new reactors can be an extremly risk way of producing electricity, as the catastrophe at Chernobyl shows. The area arround the reactor is even today closed for people, because the flat is radioactive. Secondly, a reactor produces tons of highly dangerous waste that has to be monitored for many thousands of years before it is safe. But why don´t they invest the money in alternative sectors? If the British goverment or the whole EU invest the money, that they want to take for building new reactors, in solar engineering in the Sahara, only 4% of the Saharas area will be enough flat in order to produce enough energy for the complete European Union. In my view I would say that the British goverment and the whole Eu should invest in alternative sector. I know the most politicans would say that Afrika is too dangerous to build there solar engineering. But if they do, they will earn clean and enough energy for europa. Secondly it will create thousands of new jobs in Affrica. So the people will accept this solar- factory. |
GAST stellte diese Frage am 16.05.2009 - 13:21 |
Antwort von GAST | 16.05.2009 - 18:40 |
In the last ten years, the attitude to nuclear power plants has changed. However, environmentalist were against building new reactors. They bring forward the argument kein komma that nuclear power plants were too dangerous. But lately, they diagnose kein komma that nuclear power plants were useful to save the environment. On the one hand, Firstly, the UK wants to become independent of oil as soon as possible, as the oil reserves are declining. Furthermore to import cheap gas from Russia is not a solution, because the Russian government deploys the gas reserve as a political weapon. In addition a nuclear reactor creates only a small amount of greenhouse gases and it saves the economy without destroying the environment. A positive side-effect is, if the goverment and the companies build new reactors, it will create 10.000 new jobs. But on the other hand, there are a lot of disadvantages. To build new reactors can be an extremly risky way of producing electricity, as the catastrophe at Chernobyl shows. The area around the reactor is closed for people even today, because the flat is radioactive. Secondly, a reactor produces tons of highly dangerous waste that has to be monitored for many thousands of years before it is safe. But why do they not invest the money in alternative sectors? If the British government or the whole EU invest the money, that they want to take for building new reactors, in solar engineering in the Sahara, only 4% of the area of the Sahara will be enough flattened (bin mir nicht sicher, was du meinst in order to produce enough energy for the complete European Union. In my view I would say that the British goverment and the whole Eu should invest in alternative sectors. I know, (kein "the") most politicians would say that Afrika was too dangerous to build solar engineering there. But if they do so, they will earn clean and enough energy for europe. Secondly, it will create thousands of new jobs in Africa. Thereby (klingt besser^^) kein "the" people will accept this solar- factory. |
Antwort von GAST | 16.05.2009 - 19:02 |
danke für deine mühe... :) |
322 ähnliche Fragen im Forum:
> Du befindest dich hier: Support-Forum - Englisch- Richtig ? Übersetzung korrigieren, bitte! (1 Antworten)
- Ist dieser Englischsatz richtig? (1 Antworten)
- Anleitung zum Schminken: Grammatik richtig so? (2 Antworten)
- grammatik:Sätze verbessern und kontrollieren , bitte! (1 Antworten)
- ist der satz richtig? (6 Antworten)
- satz so richtig? (5 Antworten)
- mehr ...
ÄHNLICHE FRAGEN:
- Richtig ? Übersetzung korrigieren, bitte!Hi Ist diese Übersetzung richtig ? 1. Warum bekommt sie so viel Taschengeld? Bestimmt weil sie ein Mädchen ist. -> ..
- Ist dieser Englischsatz richtig?Don`t play a game if you don`t know haow it`s end because than you lose! ist das richtig? :) Dankeschonmal.
- Anleitung zum Schminken: Grammatik richtig so?Hey ist der Satz so richtig? In these days you just need mascara and a light summer tan
- grammatik:Sätze verbessern und kontrollieren , bitte!hallo, ich soll die fehler in den sätzen verbessern und will jetzt wissen. ob ich das richtig habe freue mich, wenn jemand ..
- ist der satz richtig?hab ma ne frage also ich wollte jemandem schreiben das ich mich wegen ihm selbstverletzt hab... weis aber nicht genau wie... ..
- satz so richtig?ist der satz so richtig? in 1978, the flowers did flowered earlier, because the snow is melting faster?
- mehr ...
BELIEBTE DOWNLOADS:
- Englische Rede über GentechnikIch hab hier im Forum diese selbst geschriebene Rede gefunden und habe sie ins Englische übersetzt und leicht verändert. das ..
- mehr ...